The devastating findings recently released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change really shouldn’t surprise anybody. But it should break our hearts. It does mine. Mountains of real-world scientific evidence already showed we are nowhere near the level of action needed to prevent catastrophic climate change and its consequences.

Look no further than our own home, the Pacific Northwest. An unprecedented heat dome broke temperature records, killed hundreds of people and even baked mussels and clams alive in their shells. Mount Rainier lost a third of its snowpack in that one heat event. There simply isn’t enough water for rivers, fish and farmers, at least the way irrigation is currently conducted. Forests are stressed by drought and burning at massive rates and intensity. Smoke, haze and unhealthy air is our new summer norm.

Sadly, these kinds of catastrophes and challenges are happening all across the globe.

We did this to ourselves. We failed to act, at scale, because we are all addicted to fossil fuel and the insane concept of a limitless growth economy on a planet of finite resources. Even those of us who have been trying to get attention and action on this issue for over 30 years are part of the same addicted system. Now, because we didn’t act, the scale and scope of action required is staggering.

But action is still possible. There is still a small, small window to slow climate change to a level that we and many other species can adapt to. The science is really clear, every fraction of a degree of additional warming makes the future worse, which means every fraction we avert makes it better.

So, what is needed? At a policy level we must drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions immediately and get on a path toward zero net emissions by 2050. We already have the ability to do this but have lacked the collective and political will, nationally and globally. Steps to take:

Massive investment in clean energy technologies, combined with unprecedented policies such as government buy out of old, inefficient cars so that people can afford to upgrade to electric, low-emission options.

Cap methane leaks at all fossil fuel extraction sites, immediately. Methane is a far more dangerous climate change pollutant than CO2.

Let the so-called free market actually work. Stop keeping gasoline artificially cheap at the pump. Just recently President Biden asked oil producers to increase production to bring down gas prices. That might feel nice to all of us who aren’t rich, but it’s a bonehead move if we want a livable planet.

Relocalize the economy. Rebuild local supply chains. Stop burning fossil fuel, and the planet, shipping stuff across the globe.

At the personal level we all need to reduce our energy consumption, drive less, etc. — the things we already know we should do. More importantly, in my opinion, and I’ll probably tick some people off here, we need to stop buying stuff we don’t need, stop indulging in retail therapy. Every item that includes plastic, or metal, or glass, that is shipped or trucked contributes to climate change. Buying used and buying local is every bit as big a positive action as driving less. Finally, and I’m sure to really tick some folks off here, eat less meat. The meat industry is one of the biggest contributors of climate change pollution in the world.

Lastly, the most important action is to finally start treating this like the urgent crisis it is. We do not have time for the luxury of apathy, denial, or overwhelm. The COVID-19 delta variant may be devastating, but a destabilized planet is far more deadly. My fervent hope and affirmation is that the uncomfortableness of our new norm will move us to create a saner trajectory going forward — we still have that option, for a very little while at least.

Sign up for our Daily Headlines newsletter

Cylvia Hayes is CEO of 3EStrategies, and founder of The ReThink.

(5) comments


If reducing fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions are in fact the solution, then here's the problem: of the 195 global nations only China increased use of fossil fuel energy categories and increased CO2 emissions compared to year 2019 despite the devastating impacts of the global wide Covid pandemic. If renewables are the answer, China and India use disproportionately small amounts. And China and India together activated over 300 new coal plants in 2020.

Nothing the IPCC or UN or Paris has even dreamed of has restricted or inspired China and India to adopt the sort of energy use restrictions this op-ed exhorts us to adopt. That's unsurprising because adopting such energy use restrictions would hamstring China's and India's economies and likely cause the sort of political and social upheavals no government wants.

If this author believes in these restrictive social measures are necessary and effective, then please try to publish your op-ed in Beijing and Mumbai first.

Smedley Doright

I will withhold comments on the desperate cry for relevancy now that your boyfriend is out of power.

But the important question is, what can you sell me to help me feel less guilty?


But Smedley, did you withhold comments?

Smedley Doright

Yes. I absolutely withheld comments. I could write a book based on first hand interaction, over years with Ms. Hayes. Trust was broken.


Amen! We are way behind. Sign up for the Blue Sky option with your power provider and get that quote for solar. The urgency should be apparent to everyone.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.