I am writing in response to a recent letter calling for the disenfranchisement of urban voters in favor of rural Oregonians through the establishment of a state version of the Electoral College. I understand why conservatives wish they could exert minority rule over state government as they currently do at the federal level, but this suggestion ignores our nation’s history and Constitution.

The letter writer incorrectly claims that Americans would never agree to majority rule, which is patently false. While we are not a pure democracy, the anti-majoritarian Electoral College and Senate are the exceptions, not the rule, in the unique system of governance that we like to call a democratic republic. The vast majority of political power in this country, from governor down to dog catcher, is distributed through the workings of small “d” democracy.

This also isn’t the first time that rural and urban residents disagreed about whether certain Americans were entitled to greater rights than others. We had a big fight about it, in fact — they called it the Civil War. Afterward, we even went through the trouble of amending the Constitution to make absolutely certain that there would be no further confusion about the matter — and now, the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “no State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws.”

The Supreme Court subsequently applied the Equal Protection Clause to the issue of rural overrepresentation advocated by the letter writer in the 1964 case of Reynolds v. Sims, wherein the Court clearly established the principle of “one person, one vote.” In the words of Chief Justice Earl Warren: “Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests.”

Unfortunately for Republicans, this means that if they want to control state government, they are going to have to do it the old-fashioned way — by winning elections. This is admittedly hard to do for a party that denies climate change, opposes common sense gun safety measures and nominates a Senate candidate who espouses crazy conspiracy theories and an attorney general candidate who isn’t even an attorney. So instead they’ve turned to Plan B, and now we get to read about half-baked ideas that will never come to fruition, like the state of Jefferson, Greater Idaho and now a state version of the Electoral College.

I have a better idea. As Americans, we’re free to live in whichever state we want — and there are 50 flavors to choose from. Since conservative Oregonians have clearly identified an unspoiled Eden to our east, I’d like to point out the path of least resistance. But they don’t need to take my word for it. I will instead quote the Twitter feed of their leader, President Donald Trump, who famously stated: “If you are not happy here, you can leave!”

Idaho is just a few hours away, after all.

Chad Buelow lives in Bend.

(4) comments

David Ewing

Well said Chad. And thank you for mentioning Jo Rae Perkins, an avowed QAnon believer who received over 900,000 votes in her bid to unseat Incumbent Jeff Merkley. This alone, should be deeply troubling to all Oregonians because it is in everyone’s best interest to have a robust two party system based on facts, logic, reason & science. Conspiracy theories are for dictatorships and banana republics. The Oregon Republican Party has a big task in front of it...

SB1

To both Chad Buelow and MFBend: very, very well said.

MFBend

Rural folks who want a stronger representation than their numbers allow frequently say “Where would city slickers be without our farms and ranches?” Conversely, urbanites reply “Where would you ruralites be without our doctors, hospitals, capital generating and tax paying businesses?” So I think we should agree both have value. But I believe democracy still requires one person, one vote.

Marcomm

Well said!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.