Guest Column

This column is going to anger some readers, and probably offend others. But it needs to be written. There is much more going on right now than demonstrations and riots over the death of George Floyd. There is a threat to our criminal justice system being encouraged by some police officers and elected officials.

Like every other human on this planet with access to an electronic device that allowed viewing the video of Officer Derek Chauvin pressing his knee into the neck of George Floyd, I was horrified at what I saw. Like everyone, I leapt to the conclusion that this was unwarranted murder. Some people took to the streets to demonstrate against the viewed horror. Others destroyed innocent people’s businesses, property, vehicles. Whether peacefully carrying signs or wrecking violence and mayhem, all was said to be in the cause of justice for George Floyd.

A multitude of people, from Barack Obama to Joe Biden, Hollywood actors and actresses, well-known and obscure sports figures, anyone with a reporter’s microphone nearby or on the telephone, have voiced their opinions about the death of Mr. Floyd. Everyone concluded it was an unjust murder, motivated by hate and racism. They may well be right. But what facts do they have to support their conclusion? The only thing any of us has right now is a video recorded on the cellular phone of a bystander.

Yes, the video seems clear. The conclusion everyone has reached is there can be no doubt as to what happened, and as to what the motivations of the officer were. There can be no doubt why the other three officers did nothing to halt the act of Officer Chauvin. They are all racists, and should be fired, then indicted, tried and convicted.

Unfortunately, there have also been a number of law enforcement officials and elected officials who have openly expressed their own outrage at what happened also.

Some sheriffs chose to show their solidarity with the protesters by marching with them, or kneeling at demonstrations. On June 2, the Bend Police Department, Bend police chief and Deschutes County district attorney were quoted in The Bulletin openly condemning this murder.

What is wrong with this? There is a principle in criminal law referred to as the presumption of innocence. “Innocent until proven guilty” is the phrase often used. We have had an arrest, and charges have been filed. But there has been no trial. There has been no adjudicated verdict. We all watched a video and convicted Officer Chauvin, with no more facts or evidence than the video.

I agree with everyone that based on the video, Officer Chauvin is guilty. However, I also think it is reprehensible that any law enforcement official or elected official publicly speaks out as if the trial has taken place. We expect the general public to leap to conclusions based on a small amount of evidence, however damning. But we do not expect, nor should we accept, our law enforcement officials and district attorney also lowering themselves to this behavior. I do not know what their oaths of office say, but I doubt they include leaping to conclusions without facts and then expressing themselves publicly.

The Bend Police Department, police chief and Deschutes County district attorney need to apologize to the citizens of Bend and Deschutes County for their unprofessional behavior. And they need to learn when being silent, or choosing their words much more carefully, is appropriate. We can express our abhorrence at Mr. Floyd’s death without compromising the laws and principles that govern our conduct as a civilized society.

Dennis Dietrich is a retired forester living outside of Bend.

(9) comments

Skittish

I agree with the author, that Porter and Hummel would better serve by waiting for the system in which they work, to be allowed to work. There is indeed a lot more going on that just Floyd’s death, the protests and riots. There is much strife and if there is ever a time to be disciplined, it is now. There is more information that needs to be gathered, analyzed and weighed critically, which is best done, albeit imperfectly, by the legal system.

I would disagree that all of the officers were primarily motivated by racism as I can’t read minds. Another explanation other than racism is that they have become accustomed to the power they have and use excessive force as a habit in their daily work. This may be due to low standards and under training. If true, then what do we need to do to improve hiring standards and training? Law enforcement may need more money, not less: if you don’t understand the tasks, challenges and policies police really face, then how do you know what they really need to improve?

No one knows the mindset of the involved officers and how often they have done exactly the same thing to other suspects of all races. Simply punishing out of anger, and then believing something has been solved may only delay a true solution. “Speaking out” in such an obvious case of wrong doing doesn’t mean you are good or courageous: it’s very easy to jump on the current bandwagon. Perhaps those who speak out the most vociferously are the weakest among us.

gsr

What about Mr. Floyd's presumptive innocence for the alleged counterfeit $20?

Funding Secured

Somehow, and I haven't checked Mr. Dietrich's math on this, the fifth amendment is the real victim here.

BuckeyeDuck

Interesting point that I've seen mentioned only a few times.

Skittish

I think you are referencing my comments about the legal system being allowed to do its work. Mr. Floyd was killed before he had that chance and thus his rights were violated: there is no argument against this. If anything that outcome should support the idea that the justice system needs to be allowed to work. It clearly doesn't always, but mob mentality isn't the answer to its shortcomings: I see no reason to jump from the frying pan to the fire. Is the perfect the enemy of the good? Things don't work perfectly, so let's just destroy law enforcement and legal system?

CardiacSpike

I commend all law enforcement officers and their leadership who have spoken up, spoken out, and physically met with (to include taking a knee) with those citizens who are angered, enraged, concerned, saddened at what happened to Mr. George Floyd - and others of all colors at the hands of a small percentage of unworthy police officers.

Chief Porter, Sheriff Shane Nelson, Chief Dale Cummins, and DA John Hummel have shown ardent and well-considered interest and displayed ethical, moral, and professional courage by their actions.

Each in his own way, and all those others who wear the badge or try the cases, have successfully engaged people at their level, which if on one knee, is active and positive communication at its best.

I am a retired Oregon law enforcement officer and immensely proud of those mentioned and all those others who are dedicated to People being safer because we are present.

Funding Secured

+1

gsr

I agree.

BuckeyeDuck

Well stated.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.