Guest Column

The podium at Bend Venture Conference at the Tower Theater in Bend October 20, 2017. 

Bill Eddie’s guest column in The Bulletin on the decline of Bend’s livability hit the mark except that for many of us who were born and raised here in the 1930s and 1940s, Bend has been unrecognizable for several years. Numerous residents have expressed concern about the obvious decline in livability, but to no avail. Why?

1. The local development community is well-organized and well-funded because growth pays well. Opposing questionable projects requires funds that the opponents may not have.

2. Our political leadership, including the county level, is usually business oriented by education and experience and tend to support the short term benefits of a development while accepting, or ignoring long term environmental degradation.

3. Economic factors almost always win over environmental considerations.

An emphasis on the economy is important, but there must be a balance between the economy and the environment. The Bulletin periodically publishes a summary of economic indicators for the region including job and wage growth in various sectors. How often have we seen a comprehensive index for environmental (livability) factors? Livability, which includes a host of factors including amount of open space, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, sense of community and traffic congestion, can be measured, but they are evidently not considered important enough to bother with. Bend does have a 2030 Plan which addresses some of these factors, including preservation of trees, but after viewing the scorched earth development occurring south of Reed Market, one wonders if anyone has looked at it.

Livability will continue to decline locally because of continued rapid growth and the emphasis on drawing thousands to the region as tourists. Our fragile natural areas are showing the impact of too many people which will result in some sort of fee system and limitations in use because of a permit requirement. (Who will have priority, locals, or tourists?) Central Oregon provides a classic example of Garrett Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” where individuals, or businesses maximize their use of a “commons” (public area) for profit, or personal use to the detriment of that commons. The Deschutes River is used by kayakers, rafters, swimmers, irrigators and fisherman. Dams have been built for power production. Its banks are cleared of shade-providing trees by homeowners and commercial establishments and serves as a source for stormwater. The result is a seriously degraded river which is a receptacle for trash and silt, is in danger of warming and fluctuates greatly in flow. For another example, think of all the ways that Pilot Butte has been used, or abused over the years. Add thousands more residents and tourists to the area and the future for these resources is predictable.

The solutions provided by community leadership usually address the symptoms of the problems, not the cause. The road bond is a good example and it should be obvious that with continued growth of population and tourism, another bond for roads will be needed in a few years. This is also true for schools, libraries and parks and recreation as growth obviously does not pay for itself and needs to be subsidized by taxpayers. Bend’s leadership needs to address the problem of both rapid growth and tourism. This will not be easy and I don’t believe the current leadership is capable, or willing. We do need to stop advertising for tourists and discourage the construction of more large hotels. Tourism and the hospitality industry traditionally pays low wages compared to other sectors in the economy. Although population growth will be difficult to stabilize, we need some elected leaders, or consultants to investigate the problem for possible solutions. Another challenge is that many newcomers to the area see Bend as much more livable than the degraded area they moved from, so many do not understand the problems. Only when they sense a continued decline in livability will they become concerned.

Charles Boyd lives in Bend.

(4) comments

David Clark

"so many do not understand the problems."

YES!! The root cause of the problem is jamming more people into the same area. This is forced on us by the urban growth boundary. The UGB also forbids building on most vacant land and creates a shortage of buildable land which makes land prices skyrocket. The solution is obvious: get rid of the intentional shortage land.

FriendofBend

Excellent points. We need to proceed with a Bend community vision update. The Bend 2030 group of community members is proceeding with a 2050 Vision. Look for opportunities to participate in this process. It is imperative for all of us to speak up for the future of Bend!

David Clark

Be sure those plans include getting rid of the artificial shortage of land, and resulting high land prices, caused by the UGB. a little research shows that NO CITY has ever increased affordability by increasing density. Also increased density increases congestion because it puts more cars on the same roads.

bob

Excellent points? I'm struggling to find a single good one in his whole rant. His whole complaint boils down to that he doesn't like that more people live/visit here than used to. At no point does he go into detail about what about "livability" has suffered, and instead complains about a bunch of historical environmental issues with the river that are being remedied (or aren't even problems anyway).

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.