Blurred of microphones in seminar room, talking speech in conference hall light with microphone and keynote. Speech is vocalized form of communication humans, vintage tone

Much of a Bend City Council meeting is pre-scripted, tame drama. Staff talks. Councilors discuss. Councilors vote. Then march through more agenda.

Decorum is the rule. There is the occasional councilor versus councilor clash. Few cliffhangers.

The public comment section is different. It can teem with surprise. It gets edgy. People criticize the city. What, though, should councilors do when the comments cross the line? And where is the line?

The Bend City Council rules subcommittee met last week and plans to meet again this week to talk about how public comment might be improved. How long should people be able to speak? When should the public comment be during the meeting? And are there other ways the council could gather public input?

Councilors have not made any changes, yet. They just talked about them. Some of the options discussed include:

1. Allow public comment for an hour at every meeting starting at a set time, perhaps from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. Then, it would end. That idea seemed to be dismissed because public comment doesn’t usually last an hour, anyway.

2. Move public comment perhaps to the end of the meeting. That also seemed to be dismissed, because it would make it hard on the public to have to wait two hours or longer to be able to speak.

3. Allow other councilors — other than the mayor — to interrupt a speaker making inappropriate comments. As Mayor Sally Russell explained, she doesn’t know what people will say until they say it. And it can be difficult in the moment to decide if a speaker should be cut off. One suggestion was to also allow the Mayor Pro-Tem Gena Goodman-Campbell to interrupt a speaker. Another possibility is to open that up to all the councilors.

Councilor Rita Schenkelberg made an excellent point. She said the mayor or others councilors should not get into an exchange with that person over what the person said or how the person said it. The council could have a short, standardized statement to recite to end that person’s time and then shift to the next speaker. Minimize the drama. Sounds like a smart approach, if used with discretion.

4. Create other ways for the public to comment with the whole council. The public comment section of the meetings is special. It gives the public an opportunity to speak before the whole council. Live. A member of the public knows almost for certain that they will be heard, which is less certain when an email is sent. Members of the public want to have that ability to comment on the record, be recorded and allow others to hear what they have said.

Previous councils have had office hours. Usually two councilors would set up in a meeting room in City Hall or elsewhere and talk to whoever showed up. We attended a couple of those. We aren’t certain they were a roaring success. They may have just needed more time to take hold.

City Manager Eric King said staff is looking for ways that councilors could engage the public outside of the council meetings. One thing in particular that people seem to want is to have a dialogue or discussion with councilors on certain topics. Councilors generally don’t do that in the public comment section.

And it can be frustrating for speakers to ask passionate questions during a council meeting and get no response.

We hope we haven’t given the impression that councilors are gunning to silence criticism. They are not. Public comments are an important check and balance on what the city does. It’s the fabric of democracy. If comments deteriorate into ugly personal attacks, the city does need to have a smart way to hit the brakes.

(2) comments

abbymkr

I think that during the public comment period, the time allotted should be increased to 3 minutes. 2 minutes is not enough.

kindergentlerbend

Agree. Actually, before the pandemic, 3 minutes had been the traditional allotted time. I have to disagree with Councilor Schenkelberg: Current rules forbid Councilors from engaging with public commenters. Throw that rule out! It gives the public the impression that the Councilors are a group of unresponsive, unfeeling dais denizens. Certainly, return to Councilor office hours. Why was that practice stopped, anyway? Some of these ideas presented here represent a turn away from democracy; let the people in.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.