Positive retro journalist interviews press media report

When The Bulletin requests access to information from government, it sometimes hits a wall of No.

Bulletin reporter Jackson Hogan asked in 2018 the Bend-La Pine Schools for a list and price of all apps and textbooks bought for student iPads, specifically those in use. About a month later, the district told him the cost of providing the information would be $2,000. Eight district staffers would apparently have to work a total of 18.5 hours to pull the information. Then a lawyer with the High Desert Education Service District would have to work six hours at $115 an hour to review the information and redact anything necessary. The district offered to give The Bulletin 50% off or charge $1,000. Still, prohibitively pricey for The Bulletin.

House Bill 2485 seeks to enshrine 50% off for journalists in law. It requires state agencies to reduce public records request fees by 50% if the request is made in the public interest. It requires state agencies to entirely waive fees if a public records request is in the public interest and narrowly tailored. And it requires requests made by members of the news media to be treated as in public interest.

The bill is sponsored by state Rep. Karin Power, D-Milwaukie. She introduced it on behalf of the Society for Professional Journalists.

We certainly appreciate the sentiment. But sometimes 50% is no deal. The cost can still be a wall of No.

News media is not defined in the bill. That can be tricky. Maybe The Bulletin would easily qualify. What about a person who diligently tracks and regularly writes about education policy on a blog? Is that person a member of the news media? Are they acting in the public interest?

As much as we like the idea of getting 50% off, Oregon’s public records law is Oregon’s “public” records law. The news media can play a critical watchdog role and help spread information. It just seems unfair that a member of the public could be charged double for the same record as a journalist. The member of the public has just as much right to it under Oregon law, not just as much right at twice the cost. And by charging journalists half the cost, the costs of providing information to other members of the public would presumably go up, because they would be subsidizing the work of journalists.

More than 40 bills in play this legislative session aim to change Oregon’s public records laws. Some seek to block disclosure of information to the public. Some seek to make disclosure easier. We are flattered that the intent of HB 2285 is to help journalists tear down the Wall of No. But all Oregonians are entitled to the right to know what their government is doing.

HB 2485 is scheduled for a public hearing on Thursday in the House Rules Committee.

(1) comment


As a journalist and author for now 40 years I can attest to the merit of this bill and support it.

Any more the quotes as to hours involved and cost provided to journalists by those responsible for filling PRR requests simply can't be trusted. It has become a means of not providing the information requested - and one that can't be fact-checked with any accuracy.

An example? DA Hummel recently quoted me hours and cost for a PRR I have in with his office. For information regarding emails coming from his county account. He, as it turns out, is the reviewer of the PRR and it was Mr. Hummel who quoted me time and cost, payment, and what he had "found" was available on his system and was "is not".

There's a problem there.

Support the bill in question - for the little gals and guys who do great journalism as well as the "big guys" like the Oregonian, Bulletin, and others in the business of truth telling.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.