Oregon State Capitol Building in Salem, Oregon

A global pandemic. A state budget in trouble. A need for police reform. With all that going on, you might hope legislators would be working in sync during the special session.

Nope. Why not? You know the answer: A crisis doesn't make it easier to find bipartisan agreement on solving problems. It just creates more pressure to come up with solutions.

The superminority status of the Republican Party can hurt Oregon. Democrats control both houses of the Legislature and the governor's office. Democrats earned that. They won the elections. They get to push their agenda. They are who Oregonians wanted.

While it doesn't make the Republicans in the Legislature irrelevant, it does make them less relevant. They can be effectively ignored. If they are eliminated from the conversation, that can be bad for the districts they represent and the state.

The weakness of the Republicans was obvious as the special session began. Senate Republicans voted against the very rules under which the session would operate. The rules still easily passed. Under the rules, only two people have the capability to create bills or amendments during the special session: Senate President Peter Courtney and Speaker of the House Tina Kotek, both Democrats.

“The rights of the minority, no matter who the minority party is, are extremely important and they are compromised by these special session rules,” said Senate Republican Leader Fred Girod, of Stayton. “Without the ability to create or amend legislation, my colleagues and I are legislators by name only during the special session.”

Girod is right, though there's more to it than that. Yes, the rules of the special session are indeed strikingly different than the rules of a regular session. But we looked back at the rules of special sessions in the past. The extreme limitation on who controls what legislation can be introduced is not exactly unusual. And as we said, if his party wants more say in Oregon government, it needs to win more races.

The question is also, though, if the Democrats in control of Oregon government go too far in ignoring Republicans.

"It is a fundamental power grab by the majority party . . . to eliminate one of the procedural mechanisms designed for the express purpose of guaranteeing individual rights and they also, as a consequence, would undermine the protections of the minority point of view."

Who said that? It was Joe Biden in 2005 when he was a U.S. Senator. It was a different time, place and debate. The point is still the same.

(1) comment

Funding Secured

Come on, less searching for Biden quotes and more pressure on ORP to do something about their pathetic electoral performance. There is a fat and happy incumbency satisfied with their positions in the minority and that are refusing to take code red action to break the super majority and expand the tool-kit beyond withholding quorum. Ride them like a rental donkey Mr. Coe.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.