Businessman looks on collapse domino effect. Stress resistance business. Financial stability. Recovery business. Evaluation of cash risks. Creating a strategy. Management and planning. Decision making

The investigator’s conclusion was straightforward. Carrie McPherson Douglass, Bend-La Pine School Board member, was not found to have done anything wrong.

She did not violate school board policy, legal standards for campaign speech or the district’s harassment policy when she posted personal information about her opponent, Maria Lopez-Dauenhauer, on Facebook during the May campaign for school board.

That doesn’t mean what McPherson Douglass did was right.

On April 15 McPherson Douglass posted on her personal Facebook page fairly typical political campaign charges — that her opponent is “uber wealthy” lives in a $4.2 million house, spent most of her life in California, is a single-issue candidate who is committed to fully reopening schools “at all costs” and has “far-right views.” Then she did something out of the ordinary: She posted Lopez-Dauenhauer’s address, a map showing where the home is, and a family picture, including Lopez-Dauenhauer’s children.

“I do not want any negative comments about her here or anywhere else,” she did add. “She is a mother and a Central Oregon community member and I want all candidates treated with respect.”

Lopez-Dauenhauer filed a complaint with the school board, saying McPherson Douglass was doxing, or revealing personal information about her to hurt her.

We aren’t going to go into detail of the legal analysis by the investigator, a lawyer hired by the High Desert Education Service District. Briefly, Oregon did not have a doxing law when these actions took place. School district policy has no specific policies applicable to board member’s conduct when they are campaigning. And laws regarding political speech give people a lot of freedom to express themselves.

There’s no question that Lopez-Dauenhauer’s address was publicly available before McPherson Douglass posted it on Facebook. It’s in the form candidates must fill out when running for office, among other places. But was it necessary for McPherson Douglass to make it easier for people to find it, to publicize it? Note that McPherson Douglass got security and a private address for her own home to protect her own family.

Images of Lopez-Dauenhauer’s children were also part of Lopez-Dauenhauer’s campaign. Still, should McPherson Douglass have used images of her opponent’s family as part of an effort to campaign against her opponent? Using a picture of Lopez-Dauenhauer would be one thing. Using an image that included her children is another.

The most telling thing is that McPherson Douglass apologized for the post. She wrote she regretted it from the moment she hit publish. She took the post down. She deserves credit for recognizing that. And while we are certain she will continue to be an excellent school board member, the post was wrong.

If you want to read the investigator’s report and conclusions, we had to make a public records request to get it. Email us at rcoe@bendbulletin.com, and we will send you a copy.

Sign up for our Daily Headlines newsletter

(4) comments

kindergentlerbend

Typically half measured Bulletin editorial--and the mashed up headline that, while written to be noncommittal, actually shows favoritism by saying FIRST that she was cleared. I have no sympathy with the anti-education views of Douglass's opponent, but what Douglass did to dox her opponent should not be swept under the rug under the pretext that it wasn't illegal.

BuckeyeDuck

I'm in agreement with you, but what's done is done as there is no law on the books. At least Douglas took down the post and appologized which is something we've not seen from the various protestors who showed up outside of health commissioners homes to protest covid restrictions, or Bundy supporters in Boise showing up at the house of the judge hearing his case about trespassing, etc. It's too bad Douglas did follow a similar lead in this case.

Funding Secured

But come on, the wealthy decrying the 'uber wealthy' is a perfect screen shot of politics in Bend. :chef's kiss:

BuckeyeDuck

[thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.