A fish hatchery at Shevlin Park was built in 1919, two years before the property became a city park. 

Slowly and almost surely Bend is losing its parks. They aren’t going away. They aren’t being bought up for development. But as Bend’s population grows and becomes more dense everyone’s public open space gets a bit less.

Is it noticeable? Perhaps not. But if you think about what Shevlin Park was like 10 or 15 years ago and how parking can be gobbled there now, there has been a change.

Bend is lucky, of course. It has great parks and other nice facilities. It has a river. And just outside of Bend there is fantastic access to public land. So there is hardly a crisis. There is a gradual shift.

Housing density is loved, because it protects Oregon from sprawl. It lowers development costs for infrastructure. Roads, sewers, water and more are cheaper to provide if the population is close together. It doesn’t help city parks. Land prices go up. And although people can get exercise in multistory indoor facilities, it is not the same as being outside on the grass.

Planners for the Bend Park & Recreation District can show the numbers. The acres per thousand people of parks are predicted to decline in Bend over the next five years. That’s true of neighborhood parks. It’s true of big, regional parks, such as Shevlin. And it’s true of city trails. That depends on assumptions about population growth measured against the plans the park district has over the next five years and also other things it knows will be built.

The district also looks at accessibility of parks and trails to ensure they are spread out across the community. It would like to have parks within a half mile easy walk for everyone in the district. It’s true for less than half of district residents now.

And the district is working on more granular data. It is overlaying census tract information on income, minorities and more to see if it is truly reaching out equitably. It should make those maps available to the public on its website when it has them ready. That should provide important information about where parks and facilities may be needed.

The most difficult thing to measure may be along the lines of what park district board member Jason Kropf asked: What does it mean if neighborhood park acreage slips from 7.76 acres per thousand in 2019 to 7.67 acres per thousand in 2020? Probably not much. But if the long-term trend continues down, it does mean something. A crowded park can make it much less attractive for people to go and get exercise or just get outside.

The park district is looking for answers. What can it do? It can work with developers to ensure they include open space and trail access in new housing projects. It can encourage apartment builders to include gym space or perhaps even a pool. The district may need support from voters for a bond to make investments in additional facilities. And it may need to think about ways to make it easier for people to access the ample public lands beyond the district’s borders.

(1) comment


This article is framed in a misleading and non-constructive manner. The true issue here is how will BPRD keep up with population growth, not how density vs. sprawl will affect our parks. Many people live within 1/2 mile of a park but still bike or drive to our 'crown jewel' parks like Shevlin, Hollingshead, Riverbend or Juniper. It is unrealistic to build parks of this caliber within 1/2 mile of everybody if we sprawl. Our best shot is to build more housing close to these existing services and learn how to share, add trail capacity, etc. Bulletin, your title and introduction does not get to the root of the problem facing our parks district as we grow, but instead stokes decisive feelings individuals have regarding densification vs. sprawl. This is not journalism, it is click-bait and agenda pushing.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.