Truth is truth, even in Washington, D.C.

It’s pretty simple.

“Telling the truth shouldn’t be hard,” U.S. Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn said this week in his Capitol Hill testimony about defending the building on the day of the insurrection.

“Fighting on Jan. 6 — that was hard,” Dunn said. “Showing up Jan. 7 — that was hard.”

But it is baffling to him that any American — let alone Americans who are supposed to be leaders — could look at hours of video, thousands of photos, hear from hundreds of witnesses, see the broken glass and the feces-smeared walls, the death and the bloodshed, and still say that day was a “loving crowd” of “normal tourists.”

Whether it’s Jan. 6, the coronavirus vaccine, the pandemic, masks, gun violence, climate change or a pizza parlor in D.C., there is a way for America to get a grip and agree on facts that support a serviceable truth, one we can acknowledge and use as the compass for our democracy.

Sure, D.C. is the capital of spin. A hearing is done, a law is passed, and it’s part of the game that politicians and their minions interpret the event with their own take.

But the traditional idea of spin is quaint in this new world of outright lies and cartoonish abandonment of truth, with Kellyanne Conway serving as a discount Plato with her “alternative facts.”

It’s the illness that is rotting us from the inside — the ignorance of truth, on every front. Nearly two-thirds of Americans said they were having a hard time figuring out what’s true whenever politicians speak, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center in 2019.

A year earlier, a Hill-HarrisX poll said a majority of registered voters don’t think polls are truthful.

Even before that, the Oxford Dictionary threw in the towel on a collective truth by declaring the word of 2016 to be an Orwellian adjective: post-truth.

It’s defined as “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”

Here’s the actual truth: We do not live in a post-truth world. There are indisputable facts — tangible, hard facts of life, death, substance and consequence — that can help us become a stronger, united country.

For a start, here are some truths in today’s big debates that we shall all hold to be self-evident:

• Officer Dunn and the three other brave and clearly battered men who testified on Capitol Hill this week fought for their lives when the mob stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. These people were neither tourists nor part of a loving crowd.

• More than 611,000 Americans are dead of COVID-19. There are bodies, death certificates, caskets and devastated families to show that this is true.

• The COVID-19 patients filling hospital rooms are largely unvaccinated.

• A mask slows the spread of airborne particles. Try it. Spray a water bottle in your face — it will be wet. Try it again while wearing a mask — it will be less wet. This is truth.

• It was roasting in Canada this summer. Flooding is ravaging cities that have been dry. The sea is rising. Ice is melting. Climate change is happening. It’s not trickery or manipulation of evidence.

• Vaccines do not put microchips into your body. (Come on, people. Do we really have to do this one?)

• Simone Biles is a phenomenal athlete and courageous woman, continuing to compete after the world heard about the horrific way she was abused by a team doctor and the disgraceful way it was handled.

There are no alternative facts, no personal truths, no alternate realities to dispute any of these statements. The serviceable, common truth in these cases is easy to see.

“Why is telling the truth hard?” Dunn asked the world during his congressional testimony. “I guess in this America, it is.”

Let’s change that.

Sign up for our Daily Headlines newsletter

Petula Dvorak is a columnist for

The Washington Post.

(3) comments


Well said. I remember the previous Bulletin ed board using the term "Alternative Fact" in an editorial about complaints of Walden not being in Bend for a town hall meeting for four years. Their defense of the term was that he'd done some in Redmond, Prineville during that time. Different communities with a different population and questions/concerns then Bend. As a resident of Bend I wouldn't go to one of the others because it's for their piece of his district, not ours. Pretty poor defense but a common term of Republicans at that time when confronted with facts. Now words like indoctrination, false facts, fake news, cancel culture are part of that lexicon.


This "opinion piece" talks about facts and then lists opinions and spin and some will just believe whatever they are told not realizing the difference between opinion and fact.


So go thru the list and give us your alternative facts for each one at the end of her piece. "Enquiring" minds want to know. No need for sources

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.