New oil train rules could improve safety (copy)

A train of tanker cars, carrying crude oil according to the placard pictured, enters the north end of Bend at Empire Avenue in this file photo.

The Bend City Council officially opposes crude oil coming through the city by rail, though the resolution passed by the council is largely symbolic.

On Wednesday, the council unanimously adopted a resolution that takes a stand against oil trains moving through Bend due to the safety and environmental risks.

The resolution does not mean oil trains are banned from Bend — cities aren’t able to do that, according to city staff. But what the resolution does do is join several other cities in Oregon to put pressure on the federal government to instill more regulations for oil traveling by train.

“It’s important for us as one of many cities to come together with this message,” Mayor Sally Russell said in the council’s meeting Wednesday.

The resolution states that the City Council will support an areawide environmental impact statement “to identify the cumulative effects that would result from existing and proposed oil-by-rail terminals, mitigation of safety and environmental risks, and the development and review of a comprehensive Health Impact Assessment prior to approval of any new oil transfer and storage permits by any state, regional or federal agency.”

The resolution also calls on the city manager to write to federal representatives and senators, as well as Gov. Kate Brown, asking that they develop legislation that would require railroad companies to make information about both current and future oil transport by rail public, and provide adequate notice to local communities of any plans for new or expanded rail facilities.

The inspiration behind the resolution came from Councilors Gena Goodman-Campbell and Melanie Kebler, who in March asked the city’s environmental committee to research the safety and environmental issues around oil trains and the derailments that have happened around the Pacific Northwest.

Safety considerations of oil traveling through Bend has long been a conversation. The issue came to the forefront in 2016 after a major derailment spilled roughly 42,000 gallons of crude oil in the community of Mosier in the Columbia River Gorge.

The full resolution can be found on the meetings and agenda page of

Reporter: 541-633-2160,

(5) comments


Why stop at trains carrying oil? Don't forget the trains that carry chemicals, carbon emissions producing automobiles, coal, etc. Heck, just ban the slow moving trains from piercing the city's atmosphere, altogether.


What a waste of taxpayer money on a document not worth the paper it was printed on. Liberals are really clueless as they drove home after.


So you are asking the same government that stopped the Keystone Pipeline which is the most environmentally safe way to ship it, and that’s even out of John Kerry’s mouth. The city needs to spend its time better addressing issues of greater impact like a growing homeless population & fire safety measures for its citizens.

Funding Secured

At least we aren't paying them to focus on areas outside of their control, in one of the fastest growing cities in America, with many novel and fast changing problems to solve, amirite?

Gary Mendoza

why tackle real, often tough, problems?; isn’t it better to virtue-signal, accomplish nothing but feel better about yourself?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.