Wash. lawmakers adjourn without funding I-5 bridge

Mike Baker and Rachel La Corte / The Associated Press /


Published Jun 30, 2013 at 05:00AM / Updated Nov 19, 2013 at 12:31AM

OLYMPIA, Wash. — Washington lawmakers adjourned for the year Saturday, bringing an end to a grueling six months of work that included two overtime sessions needed to resolve budget disputes.

The Legislature moved to disperse from Olympia on Saturday evening, a day after completing a new operating budget that had been the product of tense negotiations for weeks. The final hours included more combative talks about a transportation funding package that failed to get a vote in the state Senate.

This year’s gridlock in the Capitol led lawmakers to blow past their initial April 28 deadline, and they needed two additional sessions to complete the work. State workers had been notified of a potential government shutdown, but Gov. Jay Inslee is expected to formally sign a budget today to prevent that from happening.

It’s been more than 20 years since a budget was finished so late in the process.

Lawmakers grappled with how to bridge the wide philosophical differences between a Republican-dominated majority in the Senate and a House chamber controlled by Democrats.

“At the close of this legislative session, we can say that we have been able to do some good things for Washingtonians under tough circumstances,” Gov. Jay Inslee said at a news conference following adjournment. “With divided government, and while we’re still recovering from the recession, we’ve been able to begin turning the direction of our state.”

Some victories

He cited several measures as victories, including $1 billion in funding toward education, new rules to strengthen scrutiny of repeat DUI offenders and passage of a construction budget that includes money for the start of a long-term effort to help manage water in the Yakima River Basin.

But he was clearly angry over the final dispute that came to a culmination Saturday afternoon, when the Senate declined to take up a $10 billion transportation package despite intense lobbying from himself and business groups.

“For six months we have heard nothing from the Senate majority coalition about transportation except to say no,” Inslee said. “This was supposed to be a bipartisan majority, but it has turned into nothing but a roadblock to a transportation package. Inaction is not a solution.”

Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom, D-Medina, said he and his colleagues were unified in their opposition to the plan this session. They plan to work over the coming months to help develop a proposal that lawmakers could consider next year, Tom said.

Tom said improved infrastructure is important for the state’s economic vitality but that lawmakers first need to address policy changes for transportation projects, such as a new approach to the environmental review process. He also said the list of projects funded by the package would need to be focused more on improving congestion.

Disappointment

Senate Democrats made a last-ditch effort to pull the package to the floor for a vote through a procedural move but were unable to get the votes needed to succeed.

Sen. Tracey Eide, a Democrat from Federal Way who is co-chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said the package was the product of months of intense work.

“I’m just extremely disappointed,” Eide said.

The failure of the plan came despite pressure from Inslee, who had hoped the bill would be approved this weekend. Business leaders, who have often been aligned with this year’s Senate majority, had also asked for the bill, saying transportation improvements were necessary.

The package, which had earlier been approved by the House, would have included a 10½-cent increase in the gas tax in order to pay for a series of large projects, including State Route 167, the North Spokane Corridor, Interstate 90 over Snoqualmie Pass and a replacement bridge over the Columbia River into Oregon.

That Columbia River bridge was widely opposed by Republicans in the state Senate, who said the current proposal for the bridge was too low and should not include light rail transit. They also expressed concern about the costs.

Supporters said it was time to approve that bridge. Oregon and Washington are each responsible for $450 million of the replacement span, with the federal government and toll revenue paying the rest. Oregon has already approved its portion, and officials have expressed concern that federal money provided for the project will fall through if Washington state fails to act.

“Washington has lost $850 million in federal funds that would have helped us build a new I-5 bridge across the Columbia River,” Inslee wrote in an earlier statement.