I-5 project spurs calls for special session

The Associated Press /

Published Oct 15, 2013 at 05:00AM

PORTLAND — Supporters of an Oregon-only plan to replace the Interstate 5 bridge across the Columbia River hope to bring the issue in front of the Legislature again this month in a special session.

The project is in doubt because it was initially intended to be a joint effort between Oregon and Washington state. The Washington Legislature didn’t put up a matching $450 million contribution for a project now estimated to cost $2.7 billion.

Supporters, including business and labor groups, say a new bridge remains critical.

The project faces a variety of skeptics, among them some conservatives, Washington opponents of light-rail trains and environmentalists.

The Oregon-led plan relies on $1.3 billion worth of tolls. An $850 million federal grant would extend light rail from the north of Portland to Vancouver.

A state analysis says the project could prove accurate if interest rates remain relatively stable and if the federal government approves a $900 million loan to Oregon, providing cash as tolls roll in over the next 35 years.

“It is all doable, but it is very much threading a needle to make it all come together,” said Laura Lockwood-McCall, director of debt management in the state treasurer’s office.

If something went awry after the project broke ground, the state could have to fill the gap with general obligation bonds or other state funds — a mind-changer for lawmakers such as Rep. Dennis Richardson, R-Central Point, who voted for the bridge earlier this year.

Washington agencies, however, would still play a role.

The Oregon Department of Transportation would need agreements with its Washington counterpart to oversee construction. During the work, Oregon would collect tolls on the existing Interstate 5 bridge. Tolls are expected to range between $1.50 and $4 each way, depending on time of day.

Oregon would set the rate, but Washington officials would have to enforce the tolls by punishing Washington drivers who refuse to pay.

comments powered by Disqus